Industrial & Manufacturing Implementation Support
ERP, WMS, TMS, MES, EDI, Automation, and M&A Supply Chain Unification—planned, stabilized, or recovered.
Industrial and manufacturing implementations don't break because the software is "bad."
They break because operations, data, integrations, and cutover discipline don't get
managed with the intensity the floor requires.
BASZ Group supports industrial teams through the hardest parts of change: new system
rollouts, multi-site transitions, carve-outs and integrations, 3PL takeovers, and
remediation after a struggling go-live.
What makes Industrial & Manufacturing implementations different
Industrial environments tend to combine high variability with high consequence:
Mixed-Mode Operations
Make-to-stock + make-to-order + service parts in the same network
Traceability Requirements
Lot/serial, quality holds, recalls, audit trails
Material Complexity
BOMs, substitutions, packaging hierarchies, units-of-measure conversions
Physical Constraints
Line-side replenishment, staging, kitting, constraints by equipment and labor
Automation Dependencies
WCS/PLC interfaces, scanners, label formats, scales, conveyors, AS/RS
Multi-Site Reality
Plants + DCs + 3PLs + cross-docks + supplier-managed inventory scenarios
When those realities aren't baked into design/testing, go-live becomes a scramble.
Data "looks fine" until it hits the floor
- Inconsistent UOM conversions cause pick/pack failures
- Item master and BOM inaccuracies trigger shortages or over-issues
- Location and slotting design doesn't match handling reality
- Supplier part numbers and internal part numbers aren't reconciled
Integrations are treated like plumbing—not operations
- EDI mappings work "technically" but don't support exceptions
- ERP–WMS–TMS handshake breaks during partials/backorders
- Labeling/ASN flows don't match customer compliance rules
- Quality systems don't release inventory cleanly
Testing proves screens—not outcomes
- Test scripts don't cover rework, scrap, holds, substitutions, expedites
- No volume testing for wave planning, shipping, or label printing
- Automation and RF edge cases aren't exercised
- Returns/RTV and service parts flows are skipped
Cutover is under-scoped
- Inventory accuracy isn't validated prior to conversion
- Open orders, WIP, and in-transit inventory aren't governed
- "Day 1" rules (what freezes, what moves, what escalates) aren't clear
- Roles, permissions, and exception handling aren't rehearsed
Change management is assumed
- Supervisors aren't trained to run exceptions
- Job instructions don't match new process design
- KPIs change but expectations don't
- Temporary workarounds become permanent debt
Where we engage (pick the support you actually need)
Implementation Advisory (pre-go-live)
For teams that want a disciplined, operations-first rollout.
Process design, data readiness, testing strategy, cutover planning, risk control.
Go-Live Command Center + Stabilization
For organizations that need hands-on execution support during the most fragile window.
Triage, issue routing, floor support, daily operating cadence, backlog burn-down.
Program Recovery / Remediation
For implementations that are slipping, stuck, or post-go-live painful.
Root-cause assessment, rescue plan, process/integration fixes, retesting, re-cutover planning if needed.
Industrial M&A Supply Chain Unification
For mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, and network unification efforts.
Operating model alignment, master data consolidation, system harmonization, inventory/network strategy, governance.
Takeover Support (facility, 3PL, or internal transition)
For transitions where continuity matters more than perfection on Day 1.
Rapid current-state capture, controls, SLA/scorecard buildout, stabilization plan, execution playbooks.
These are common ranges for industrial environments—scope, site count, and readiness can shift them.
- Discovery & Current-State Mapping 2–6 weeks
- Future-State Design & Fit/Gap 4–10 weeks
- Build / Configuration & Integrations 6–16+ weeks
- Testing (SIT/UAT + Volume + Exceptions) 4–10 weeks
- Cutover Planning & Dress Rehearsals 2–6 weeks
- Go-Live + Hypercare Stabilization 4–12 weeks
- Optimization & KPI Maturity 8–24+ weeks
When unifying two industrial organizations, these are the friction points that cause delays and hidden cost:
-
Master data conflictsItem IDs, UOM, customer/supplier naming, packaging specs
-
Network overlapPlant/DC footprint decisions, cross-ship rules, freight strategies
-
Service levelsDifferent OTIF definitions and performance baselines
-
Policies and controlsCycle count rigor, quality holds, auditability, approval flows
-
Operating model mismatchWho plans, who buys, who owns inventory decisions
-
System reality"Standardize on one" vs. "coexist then converge" needs governance
- Stable shipping cadence within days—not months
- Clear exception ownership with a daily operating rhythm
- Inventory accuracy improves (not just "system accuracy")
- Backlog decreases week over week with transparent root causes
- OTIF stabilizes while cost-to-serve becomes visible
- Supervisors can run the floor without escalation dependency
- Implementation risk & readiness scorecard (ops/data/integration/testing/cutover)
- End-to-end process maps (including exception flows)
- Cutover plan + dress rehearsal scripts + Day 1/Day 2 playbooks
- Integration inventory (ERP/WMS/TMS/MES/EDI/automation touchpoints)
- Testing framework: scenarios that reflect real floor conditions
- Stabilization command center model (cadence, triage, reporting, ownership)
- M&A unification plan (30/60/90 + governance + convergence roadmap)
Looking for more?
If you're industry is Industrial or Manufacturing and you're staring at a transition, takeover, remediation, or M&A unification— let's reduce risk and protect your operations.
Tell Us What You're Dealing With
